Paper & Manuscript Resource Academic_Area Help_Center Life Opening
Before_Submit After_Submit Ebook Seminar News Book_Comment Experiment Computation Photo_show Industry
ASAP_Paper Full-Story_Paper Notes Literature Conference Lit_discussion Non-electronic_lit Electronic_lit Oversea PhD
Paper_List Paper_Writing Thesis Software Glossary Faculty Non-electronic_book Electronic_book MMs'World Postdoc
 14 12
发新话题
打印

[国外] What's your point for the story about Columbia Coffee beans

What's your point for the story about Columbia Coffee beans

Prof. Sames Retracts More Papers...
Columbia U. professor publishes notices that former grad student's work cannot be reproduced...,
For detail, pls read the report on June 16 C&E News.

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/84/i25/8425papers.html

Sezen and Sames, who we should trust? May be neither of them....

About some discussions on this scandal, pls read this blog:

http://www.paulbracher.com/blog/?p=194

There is a good reason to ask "how about their Science paper?"

本帖最近评分记录
  • Reuben 在2006-6-23 10:17 评分: 金币 +5 原因: 我最喜欢化学界的8g新闻了!

TOP

Haha! I like chem 8gua too!

[ 本帖最后由 niuniu123 于 2006-6-23 12:10 编辑 ]

Haha

引用:
原帖由 niuniu123 于 2006-6-23 12:08 发表
Haha! I like chem 8gua too!
As for Chem 8gua, MITBBS is the best one in the Chinese community. I got lots of 8gua news there. Some personal chem blogs linked by http://www.paulbracher.com/blog/ are also the good resources.

TOP

Yup! For MITBBS, however, I absorb all kinds of 8gua there. Although I know time is invaluble, I cannot help killing some time everyday with reading 8gua news. This may be good for my health!?

回复 #4 niuniu123 的帖子

yes, lab chemistry keep us at our normal ground-state, but chem 8gua news usually excite us into a higher excited-state. After emitting some trashs online, we will return to our ground state. As you can tell from the above words, I am doing some photochemsitry with coordination complexes.

I heard about a story of Sames in Nature or Science. I heard that he retracted several papers in JACS. His work is a hot and hard area - C-H ond activation.

Sames Got his tenure in 2003. Some retracted JACS paper was published in 2002 and 2003. It sounds like Sames played a big joke on the Board of Regent at C. U..

In case you cannot access C&E news

Latest News
March 15, 2006

SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
Researcher Withdraws JACS Papers
Flagship journal of the American Chemical Society may have published results that cannot be reproduced
William G. Schulz

Two research papers have been withdrawn from the Journal of the American Chemical Society because research results were irreproducible, according to notices published in the March 8 issue of JACS (2006, 128, 3102).

Columbia University professor of chemistry Dalibor Sames has withdrawn the papers. He is coauthor along with his former research group member Bengü Sezen, who was awarded a Ph.D. degree from Columbia in 2005. The journal has published other papers in which Sezen and Sames are coauthors.

Sames was not able to speak with C&EN because the matter is under investigation by Columbia. Sezen could not be reached by C&EN press time.

JACS Editor Peter J. Stang, a professor of chemistry at the University of Utah, says Sames’s retraction of the papers “is an example of the self-correcting nature of science.” He notes that it was Sames himself who found that Sezen’s research results could not be reproduced and reported this fact promptly to the journal.

Stang notes that in cases of suspected scientific fraud, journals “are not equipped to do investigations.” He says institutions receiving federal research funds are required to investigate such matters through their office of research integrity.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society



Latest News
March 23, 2006
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
Researcher Responds To Retraction Of Papers
Former Columbia Ph.D. student claims her work has been reproduced
William G. Schulz

A former Columbia University doctoral student, Bengü Sezen, says in an e-mail exchange with C&EN that she protests the retraction of two papers and parts of a third that she coauthored with Dalibor Sames, a chemistry professor at Columbia. The papers were published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society (2005, 126, 13244; 127, 3648 and 5284).

In her e-mail to C&EN, Sezen writes: "The reactions described in these publications were performed independently by my colleagues in my absence before the submission of papers; thus these retractions came as a surprise to me. I strongly protest that the retractions were made without my knowledge."

Sames retracted the JACS papers in written notices published in the March 8 issue of JACS (2006, 128, 3102). He says other scientists could not reproduce the results reported by Sezen.

Sezen communicated with C&EN via a Columbia e-mail address. However, she is currently listed as a Ph.D. student in the lab of molecular biology professor Elmar Schiebel at the University of Heidelberg, in Germany. She had been accepted as a postdoc in the laboratory of Chaitan Khosla, professor of chemistry, chemical engineering, and biochemistry at Stanford University. Khosla says the appointment has been "indefinitely delayed" due to the Columbia investigation.

Sezen continues: "During the past week, I have tried to contact professor Sames about [the retraction of papers] without any success. I have preserved copies of experimental data, which support the original claims of these publications, but was not given a chance to present these data. I am also prepared to perform the reactions under the supervision of professor Sames if I am given a chance."

"We were always suspicious about [Sezen], but we did not bring the matter to professor Sames because there was no smoking gun," says former Sames group member Brenton DeBoef, now a chemistry professor at the University of Rhode Island, Kingston. He says outside research groups reported that they could not reproduce her results. In the lab, "while she was there, we were able to reproduce stuff. Academic fraud is a very serious offense. I am sure the Sames group would not pursue this unless they had good evidence."

DeBoef says he smelled trouble from the time he began working in the lab as a postdoc in June 2003. At that time, he says, he set up a project with a graduate student and eight months later they had results to publish. In that time period, he says, Sezen published two papers. "It seemed too good to be true."

The retracted work concerns the selective activation of C–H bonds on a molecule, a technique commonly used to functionalize hydrocarbons. In the case of the Sames group, the technique is applied to the creation of complex organic molecules, for example, total synthesis of a natural product. The work could reduce the number of synthetic steps needed to make a given molecule, an important goal for chemists who work in the field of drug discovery.

Sames has declined to speak further with C&EN while an investigation of Sezen and her work is under way at Columbia. Sezen was awarded a Ph.D. degree in chemistry by Columbia in 2005.

DeBoef says of Sezen: "I enjoyed working with her. She's very smart. She's diligent, and she worked long hours." But DeBoef says he is troubled by reports that her work cannot be reproduced. "These reactions don't work. I am pretty sure of that. Somebody else should be able to do this. It needs to be able to be reproduced by someone else."

In a later e-mail to C&EN, Sezen lists three examples in which she says members of the Sames group did reproduce the results of her work before it was published. In all three instances, Sezen says, she was absent from the lab.

Columbia University has forbidden Sames or members of his research group to speak to the media about Sezen or the university's investigation. The scientists Sezen identified as being able to reproduce her work are both members of the Sames group. They declined to verify her assertions or otherwise speak with C&EN.

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society


Latest News

June 16, 2006

SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
Sames Retracts More Papers
Columbia U. professor publishes notices that former grad student's work cannot be reproduced
William G. Schulz

Four more papers are being retracted by Columbia University Professor of Chemistry, Dalibor Sames, again because work by his coauthor and former Ph.D. student, Bengü Sezen, allegedly could not be reproduced (C&EN Online, March 15).

Three of the newly retracted papers appeared in the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) and a fourth appeared in Organic Letters, another ACS publication (Org. Let. 2006, 8, 2899). All of the papers dealt with research on the selective activation of C–H bonds on a molecule, a technique commonly used to functionalize hydrocarbons.

Formal notices of the retractions of the JACS papers will be posted online (pubs.acs.org/journals/jacsat) on June 21, notes JACS editor Peter J. Stang, a professor of chemistry at the University of Utah. He had no other comment.

Sames could not be reached by C&EN for comment and, in the past, has refused to comment because of an ongoing investigation of Sezen and her work by Columbia.

Sezen has cried foul over the retractions, maintaining that she has never been properly notified or consulted. What's more, she claims not only that her work can be reproduced but that it has been reproduced by other members of the Sames group (C&EN Online, March 23). Her assertions cannot be verified because no one in the Sames group has been willing to speak with C&EN.

Sezen now also claims that Sames did not use the proper catalysts when trying to reproduce her work. In an e-mail to C&EN, she writes: "It is as simple as this: You can not make espresso without coffee beans. Prof. Sames and coworkers claimed in their retractions that they could not reproduce my recipe for espresso. And later (when I asked which brand of coffee beans they used), they stated that they did not have (and never had) coffee beans. Without having coffee beans, how can one try to reproduce the recipe?"

Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

I first got this news from Nature
News
Nature 440, 390-391 (23 March 2006) | doi:10.1038/440390c

Chemists shrug off unseemly spotlight by Emma Marris

Efforts to selectively break carbon-hydrogen bonds continue apace.

The decision by Dalibor Sames to withdraw two published papers1, 2 and part of a third3 has drawn unwanted attention to the chemical field of C–H functionalization. But the furore seems unlikely to dim the area's lustre.

Sames says in his retraction4 that his group at Columbia University in New York has been unable to reproduce the published results since graduate student and co-author Bengü Sezen left the lab. Sezen stands by the results and says that she is prepared to repeat the work under Sames's supervision. Columbia University, meanwhile, has launched an investigation into the matter.

C–H functionalization — the art of replacing carbon-bound hydrogen atoms in organic molecules with something more interesting — is unlikely to be badly damaged. "There are dozens, even hundreds, of exciting papers published every year," says Alan Goldman of Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey, author of a recent survey of the field. "I don't think the retractions will cast any shadow."

Bonds between carbon and hydrogen atoms are ubiquitous in the raw materials from which synthetic chemists make new molecules. Unfortunately, it is a serious headache to cut the strong bond between a particular hydrogen atom and the carbon to which it is attached and replace that hydrogen with something else: another carbon, say, or a phenyl group. Most techniques will indiscriminately break all such bonds in any given molecule.

The work at the Sames lab and elsewhere aims to replace this blunt approach with something more delicate: employing reusable catalysts to fashion reactions targeted at specific bonds. Such selectivity would have practical applications in industrial processes to make pharmaceuticals or fuels.

Chemist Robert Bergman at the University of California, Berkeley, is sanguine about the technique breaking out of the lab. "If you asked people ten years ago whether anyone would ever come up with a catalytic method to do this, they would have said no. I don't think it is outrageous to say that in five or ten years there will be commercial applications."

"This should have hit the news because it was right and exciting, instead of hitting the news because it was wrong," laments Travis Williams, a postdoc in the field at Berkeley. "I am sorry that the world is going to think that chemists get it wrong, because, almost always, chemists get it right."

References
1. Sezen, B. & Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13244–13246 (2004)
2. Sezen, B. & Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5284–5285 (2005).
3. Godula, K. , Sezen, B. & Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3648–3649 (2005).
4. Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3102 (2006).

[ 本帖最后由 choscar 于 2006-6-25 21:12 编辑 ]

Whenever I drink coffee, I will recall her coffee bean story......

NO doubt, Sezen's academic reputation has gone. What's the point for her to pursue another Ph.D.? Don't understand! Anyway, changing research area cannot get her reputation back. If she were innocent, She should replicate her expt. asap. No matter it happens in Germany or US. BTW, Sames isn't a good bird.

More fulltext ebooks ...

Random Ebooks

Ebook Title Publisher Format Introducer Date
Structure and Bond, Volume 128 - Liquid Crystalline Functional Assemblies and Their Supram ... Springerpdf(editorial) asymmsyn 2008年03月12日08:24
Molecular Biology in Medicinal Chemistry (Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry) John Wiely & Sonpdf(editorial) anmin 2006年08月21日12:50
Spectroscopic Properties of Rare Earths in Optical Materials Springerpdf(editorial) Reuben 2006年09月11日18:14
Modelling Molecular Structure and Reactivity in Biological Systems Royal Society ofpdf(scanned) Metalcarbene 2007年10月26日08:32
Aluminium and Alzheimer's Disease Elsevierpdf(editorial) Metalcarbene 2007年05月18日17:44

赞助商链接

赞助商链接

 14 12
发新话题